Happiness, Part 4

Originally posted at Writeindependent.org on November 30, 2011

…Should we in the West try to return to a more virtue-based morality?

I believe that we have indeed lost something important—a richly textured common ethos with widely shared virtues and values. Just watch movies from the 1930s and 1940s and  you’ll see people moving around in a dense web of moral fibers: Characters concerned about their honor, their reputation, and the appearance of propriety. Children are frequently disciplined by adults other than their parents. The good guys always win, and crime never pays. It may sound stuffy and constraining to us now, but that’s the point: Some constraints is good for us; absolute freedom is not. Durkheim, the sociologist who found that freedom from social ties is correlated with suicide also gave us the word “anomie” (normlessness). Anomie is the condition of a society in which there are no clear rules, norms, or standards of value. In an anomic society, people do as they please; but without any clear standards or respected social institutions to enforce those standards, it is harder for people to find things they want to do. Anomie breeds feelings of rootlessness and anxiety and leads to an increase in amoral and antisocial behavior. …One of the best predictors of the health of an American neighborhood is the degree to which adults respond to the misdeeds of other people’s children. When community standards are enforce, there is constraint and cooperation. When everyone minds his own business and looks the other way, there is… anomie.

 

"Copyright © 2006 Jonathan Haidt. Reprinted by permission of Basic Books, a member of the Perseus Books Group."
Posted in Writeindependent.org | Comments Off on Happiness, Part 4

Donald Trump as a Moderator?

Originally posted at Writeindependent.org on November 29, 2011

This is proof that the Republican field is so weak, that they have to bring in the high jinx to get any attention for their Republican debates! Donald Trump, real estate tycoon, master debt raiser and negotiator, the person who “coined” the phrase “You’re FIRED!” is our next Brit Hume?

Maybe the Neilson ratings were so low at the last fourteen (fifteen?) debates, that they had to bring in someone with a little “TVQ”. And the best they could come up with was Trump. How do these things happen?

One thing sums up what Donald Trump is all about: his legacy. He wants to put the biggest stamp on the world that he can before he dies so nobody (use the NY or NJ accent here) “fuh – gets about him”.

In an interview with Matt Lauer, Trump states: “But the fact is that if the wrong candidate is nominated to run, if I think it’s a candidate that’s not going to win and not very good and that could happen, I guess, I mean, I’m seeing some very good people and some very talented people and if the economy continues to be bad and I think it will because I think we have incompetent leadership, I would certainly think about running as a independent, yes.”

What eloquence! What vision! What ego!!!

If Donald has his way and actually moderates the next debate, perhaps it will be his chance to tell each candidate, one at a time “You’re FIRED!” until there’s no one left standing. When Trump is boss, guess with whom we are left? You guessed it: The Donald!

Posted in Writeindependent.org | Comments Off on Donald Trump as a Moderator?

Happiness, Part 3

Originally posted at Writeindependent.org on November 28, 2011

As we age, we should be better at learning what makes us happy. If this isn’t happening, then here is today’s lesson from Jonathan Haidt’s excellent book, The Happiness Hypothesis:

“…Most of the life goals that people pursue…can be sorted…into four categories: work and achievement, relationships and intimacy, religion and spirituality, and generativity (leaving a legacy and contributing something to society). Although it is generally good for you to pursue goals, not all goals are equal. People who strive primarily for achievement and wealth are… less happy, on average, than those whose strivings focus on the other three categories. The reason takes us back to happiness traps and conspicuous consumption (see chapter 5): Because human beings were shaped by evolutionary processes to pursue success, not happiness, people enthusiastically pursue goals that will help them win prestige in zero-sum competitions. Success in these competitions feels good but gives no lasting pleasure, and raises the bar for future success.

“When tragedy strikes, however, it knocks you off the treadmill and forces a decision: Hop back on and return to business as usual, or try something else? There is a window of time—just a few weeks or months after the tragedy—during which you are open to something else. During this time, achievement goals often lose their allure, sometimes coming to seem pointless. If you shift toward other goals—family, religion, or helping others—you shift to inconspicuous consumption, and the pleasures derived along the way are not fully subject to adaptation … effects. The pursuit of these goals therefore leads to more happiness but less wealth (on average).”

"Copyright © 2006 Jonathan Haidt. Reprinted by permission of Basic Books, a member of the Perseus Books Group."
Posted in Writeindependent.org | Comments Off on Happiness, Part 3

An Example of Flow

Originally posted at Writeindependent.org on November 27, 2011

Mihály Csíkszentmihályi first defined “flow” as a state of complete immersion in a task, where a feeling of joy envelops the person involved. When experiencing flow, time ceases to exist, the activity seems effortless, the self or ego slips away, and everything feels right with the world. Many of us witness this during sporting events or musical concerts, or a play or dance performance. The vicarious thrill in watching someone during flow may be one (sometimes unrecognized) reason why we want to be audience members.

What are you doing when you feel “flow”?

Usually people feel flow when they are doing the thing that matches their skills and abilities.

It was, perhaps, the activity or interest that most jazzed you when you were a child. For me, it was always writing and visiting stationery stores. I was a weird kid.

I mention flow because as Americans, we need to feel a sense of empowerment in our own lives before we can be grounded enough to think our vote matters. A person with low self-esteem, who is depressed, feeling ennui, won’t vote. Find your passion, get into your groove and the rest of your world falls into place.

For inspiration, here is one example of flow:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VEEfDdJyxPY

Posted in Writeindependent.org | Comments Off on An Example of Flow

Global Warming

Originally posted at Writeindependent.org on November 26, 2011

It seems to me that the present situation, with only minimalist actions to mitigate global climate change, reflects, at least in part, the “success” of the disinformation campaign that the captains of industry have at least tolerated, and, in some cases, encouraged and supported. Of course Nature will, eventually, reveal the truth, but there is potentially great harm in the disinformation, because it increases the likelihood that we will pass climate tipping points.

See http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1884649/posts

Posted in Ecology, Writeindependent.org | Comments Off on Global Warming

The Most Popular Movement

Originally posted at Writeindependent.org on November 25, 2011

The most popular movement in our country is this basic sentiment: “I’m as mad as hell and I’m not going to take this any more.”

Where did that sentiment come from? It comes from a movie written by Paddy Chayefsky, the famous playwright who penned “Network.” The movie was written before 1976, decrying television as a medium which Chayefsky noted was “an indestructible and terrifying giant that is stronger than the government.”

The sentiments of his character Howard Beale, acted brilliantly by Peter Finch, are the ravings of an insane news anchorman who “lost it” on national television, and unwittingly brought in high ratings which pushed the industry into a “mad as hell” for ratings pandering machine.

What Paddy was against was people watching TV just to fuel or express their anger and frustration. It is a carnival show, and now the show is us, mad as hell on Wall Street, making the institutions we most rail against the very ones that produce our “show” and make money off of us.

I hope you realize by now that my writing isn’t to create an incendiary situation, or to change anyone’s mind about politics, or to topple the wealthy and give to the poor disenfranchised citizens of this country some semblance of respect. My purpose is to say to you: each and every one of you has internal power, your own sense of your self as important in this world. The best you can do is to have meaningful relationships with a few people around you, and be the full expression of your God given talents and abilities within the context of your humanity, never forgetting that your very life comes from this earth and its gifts. If you don’t believe in God, then whatever created you from the ether: claim this mortality as a specific point in time, with your own fingerprints, and develop your own character, man!

Watch this excerpt, if you’ve never seen the movie or you just want to see this impassioned speech again: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dib2-HBsF08

This is not my favorite excerpt from the film, however. If you keep coming back, I will show it to you.

 

Posted in Writeindependent.org | Comments Off on The Most Popular Movement

Why So Difficult?

Today’s harvest

Originally posted at Writeindependent.org on November 23, 2011

Why do I choose the most difficult thing to do?

I could have looked for a job in industries where I had experience: medical office management, sales, design, or gardening. I could have spent my savings to go back to school and learn a new career. Or maybe I could have started a small business editing video for my friends, putting together scrapbooks, or started a cooking school.

Instead, I decided I wanted to change Washington. Why did I have to pick the most difficult thing?

To change Washington, will require getting the attention of over a hundred million American voters, and then convincing them that it is in their best interest to elect people who have not been bought by special interests. When the media pushes the people who are already in conflict-of-interest situations, when all those advertising dollars promote more-of-the-same politics, when all the cards are stacked against this grand experiment working, why would I ever choose to do this, of all things?

I believe in the spunk of optimism, of fantastic turns of fate, and of the power of the underdog. I believe that the American spirit is about fighting for what is right, against all odds! Plus, I only have only one life to live, and my motto is: when given the choice, I will do what I feel is the right thing, let my conscience be my guide.

Above your health, value your good conscience. It is what you take with you beyond the grave.

Posted in Writeindependent.org | Comments Off on Why So Difficult?

True Value vs Artificial Value: My Economic Theory

Originally posted at Writeindependent.org on November 22, 2011

As any economist will tell you, economics is an art, not a science. It is built from the ether up. I can tell you with great confidence that I am an economic philosopher, without ever having obtained a degree in economics. A huge portion of economic theory comes from the creative impulse. Just ask any economist.

What I am about to outline for you is my own economic theory. And at the end of this lesson, I will ask you to take a leap of faith.

Why was Apple so successful?

This is just one example of how money follows love.

The reason Apple was/is so successful is that we love Steve Jobs. We love his products, his design, and we want to support it. It’s a win/win when we buy an Apple product and the company (Apple) takes care of us with excellent support. (Things break down when that support starts deteriorating!) Their products are beautiful, they work well, and they have a certain panache. The huge profits that Apple makes can be thought of as our expression of love for the company, its founder, the people who work there, as well as its products. I know how I feel when I see an Apple technician in his blue shirt: comforted.

We buy things we either 1. Need or 2. Love. And when the two go together, it’s like amazing sex.

Often, we buy things we despise. This is a difficult situation, because we only buy those things we hate when we need them so badly, we “can’t do without” them. A perfect example of this is gasoline. I don’t know about you, but I hate buying gas because it represents a degradation of my environment and it stinks. Any time a person buys something that they know isn’t really good, if during the process of getting to your house, it created some bad effect; if all the way back to the place from whence it came it has a dubious history, then that person is splitting his soul.

The business practices of companies have to be taken into account when we attribute value to that company. We need to start promoting companies we love, putting our money where are values are, because doing anything else doesn’t feel good.

This marks the difference between True Value and Artificial Value: does it feel good?

A company who takes care of its people, who wants to make a superior product in design, in function, and taking into account its ecology, should be the company that wins the business. Have we been awarding our cash to the companies who mirror our values, or are we throwing good money after bad, giving it away to companies who aren’t taking care of us in a myriad ways? Would you rather support a company that pollutes, pays its top executives ridiculous salaries and bonuses, and worse: lies to us, or a company that tells it like it is, provides a product that lasts and functions elegantly, and is fiscally responsible to society? If the later product costs a little more or takes time to make, isn’t it worth it.

Instead of being an “unconscious consumer” we have to give careful consideration to our purchases. If we don’t, we are actually contributing more and more to this splitting of our own souls.

So don’t be a careless consumer. The leap of faith you must take is to trust your own instincts. Not the ones that are driven by your fears, but the ones that are wooed by love.

Posted in Economy, Writeindependent.org | Comments Off on True Value vs Artificial Value: My Economic Theory

Who Sold Out Our Future?

Originally posted at Writeindependent.org on November 21, 2011

Gramm Leach Bliley – Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999 – banking deregulation – housing crisis – 2008 – economy – recession – depression

I became very interested in the Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999 (aka the Federal Home Loan Bank System Modernization Act of 1999 or the Gramm—Leach—Bliley Act) when I learned that it was responsible for the final dismantling of the Glass Steagall Act. The Glass Steagall Act, passed in 1933 had been protecting our economy from wild shifts (boom and bust fluctuations) since the Depression.

The purpose of the Financial Services act of 1999 was supposedly “To enhance competition in the financial services industry by providing a prudential framework for the affiliation of banks, securities firms, and other financial service providers, and for other purposes.”

Opponents of the bill warned that it would cause the banks to be in a conflict of interest relationship with securities and insurance institutions. They also predicted that the banks would take on more risk than they could possibly cover, and that they would have a “too big to fail” outcome; which, as we now know, forced the government to back them when the chips fell.

Interestingly, the bill also safeguarded the investors’ and preparers records, ostensibly “to protect clients’ nonpublic personal information” but also making it impossible to point a finger at the people who stood out as the main winners in the gambling scheme of insuring subprime mortgages against default.

The bill was authored by Sen. Phil Gramm (R, Texas), Rep. Jim Leach (R, Iowa), and Rep. Thomas J. Bliley, Jr. (R, Virginia) and cosponsored by:

Rep Bachus, Spencer [R-AL-6]
Rep Baker, Richard H. [R-LA-6]
Rep Castle, Michael N. [R-DE]
Rep Cook, Merrill [R-UT-2]
Rep Kelly, Sue W. [R-NY-19]
Rep King, Peter T. [R-NY-3]
Rep LaTourette, Steven C. [R-OH-19]
Rep Lazio, Rick [R-NY-2]
Rep Maloney, James H. [D-CT-5]
Rep McCollum, Bill [R-FL-8]
Rep Ney, Robert W. [R-OH-18]
Rep Roukema, Marge [R-NJ-5]

 

The following Representatives voted in favor of the Financial Services Act in the 106th Congress: (Democrats in italics).

Ackerman
Aderholt
Allen
Andrews
Armey
Bachus
Baird
Baker
Baldacci
Ballenger
Barcia
Barr
Barrett (NE)
Bartlett
Bass
Bateman
Becerra
Bentsen
Bereuter
Berkley
Berman
Berry
Biggert
Bilbray
Bilirakis
Bishop
Blagojevich
Bliley
Blumenauer
Blunt
Boehlert
Boehner
Bonior
Bono
Borski
Boswell
Boucher
Boyd
Brown (FL)
Bryant
Burr
Burton
Buyer
Callahan
Calvert
Camp
Canady
Cannon
Cardin
Carson
Castle
Chabot
Chambliss
Clayton
Clement
Clyburn
Coble
Collins
Cook
Cooksey
Cox
Cramer
Crane
Crowley
Cubin
Cunningham
Danner
Davis (FL)
Davis (IL)
Davis (VA)
Deal
DeLay
DeMint
Deutsch
Diaz-Balart
Dickey
Dicks
Dixon
Doggett
Dooley
Doolittle
Doyle
Dreier
Duncan
Dunn
Ehlers
Ehrlich
Emerson
Engel
English
Etheridge
Everett
Ewing
Fletcher
Foley
Forbes
Ford
Fowler
Franks (NJ)
Frelinghuysen
Frost
Gallegly
Ganske
Gekas
Gephardt
Gibbons
Gilchrest
Gillmor
Gilman
Gonzalez
Goode
Goodlatte
Goodling
Gordon
Goss
Graham
Green (WI)
Greenwood
Gutierrez
Gutknecht
Hall (OH)
Hall (TX)
Hansen
Hastert
Hastings (FL)
Hastings (WA)
Hayes
Hayworth
Herger
Hill (IN)
Hill (MT)
Hilleary
Hinojosa
Hobson
Hoeffel
Holden
Holt
Hooley
Horn
Hostettler
Houghton
Hoyer
Hulshof
Hunter
Hutchinson
Hyde
Isakson
Istook
Jackson-Lee (TX)
Jefferson
Jenkins
John
Johnson (CT)
Johnson, E. B.
Johnson, Sam
Jones (NC)
Jones (OH)
Kanjorski
Kasich
Kelly
Kennedy
Kildee
Kilpatrick
Kind (WI)
King (NY)
Kingston
Klink
Knollenberg
Kolbe
Kuykendall
LaFalce
Largent
Larson
Latham
LaTourette
Lazio
Leach
Levin
Lewis (CA)
Lewis (KY)
Linder
LoBiondo
Lowey
Lucas (KY)
Lucas (OK)
Maloney (CT)
Maloney (NY)
Manzullo
Mascara
Matsui
McCarthy (NY)
McCollum
McCrery
McGovern
McHugh
McInnis
McIntosh
McIntyre
McKeon
McNulty
Meek (FL)
Meeks (NY)
Menendez
Metcalf
Millender-McDonald
Miller (FL)
Miller, Gary
Minge
Moakley
Mollohan
Moore
Moran (VA)
Morella
Murtha
Myrick
Napolitano
Neal
Nethercutt
Ney
Northup
Norwood
Nussle
Oberstar
Ose
Owens
Oxley
Packard
Pallone
Pascrell
Pastor
Pease
Peterson (PA)
Petri
Pickering
Pickett
Pitts
Pombo
Pomeroy
Porter
Portman
Price (NC)
Pryce (OH)
Quinn
Radanovich
Rahall
Ramstad
Rangel
Regula
Reyes
Reynolds
Riley
Roemer
Rogan
Rogers
Rohrabacher
Ros-Lehtinen
Rothman
Roukema
Royce
Rush
Ryan (WI)
Ryun (KS)
Sabo
Salmon
Sanchez
Sandlin
Sanford
Sawyer
Saxton
Scarborough
Schaffer
Scott
Sensenbrenner
Sessions
Shadegg
Shaw
Shays
Sherman
Sherwood
Shimkus
Shows
Shuster
Simpson
Sisisky
Skeen
Skelton
Slaughter
Smith (MI)
Smith (NJ)
Smith (TX)
Smith (WA)
Snyder
Souder
Spence
Spratt
Stabenow
Stearns
Strickland
Stump
Sununu
Sweeney
Talent
Tanner
Tauscher
Tauzin
Taylor (NC)
Terry
Thomas
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Thune
Tiahrt
Toomey
Towns
Traficant
Udall (CO)
Udall (NM)
Upton
Velazquez
Vento
Visclosky
Vitter
Walden
Walsh
Wamp
Watkins
Watt (NC)
Watts (OK)
Weiner
Weldon (FL)
Weldon (PA)
Weller
Wexler
Weygand
Whitfield
Wicker
Wilson
Wise
Wolf
Wu
Wynn
Young (AK)
Young (FL)

 

 

Senators: (votes on Senate Bill S.900, Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act) May 6, 1999

 

YEAs —54

Abraham (R-MI)
Allard (R-CO)
Ashcroft (R-MO)
Bennett (R-UT)
Bond (R-MO)
Brownback (R-KS)
Bunning (R-KY)
Burns (R-MT)
Campbell (R-CO)
Chafee, J. (R-RI)
Cochran (R-MS)
Collins (R-ME)
Coverdell (R-GA)
Craig (R-ID)
Crapo (R-ID)
DeWine (R-OH)
Domenici (R-NM)
Enzi (R-WY)
Frist (R-TN)
Gorton (R-WA)
Gramm (R-TX)
Grams (R-MN)
Grassley (R-IA)
Gregg (R-NH)
Hagel (R-NE)
Hatch (R-UT)
Helms (R-NC)
Hollings (D-SC)
Hutchinson (R-AR)
Hutchison (R-TX)
Jeffords (R-VT)
Kyl (R-AZ)
Lott (R-MS)
Lugar (R-IN)
Mack (R-FL)
McCain (R-AZ)
McConnell (R-KY)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Nickles (R-OK)
Roberts (R-KS)
Roth (R-DE)
Santorum (R-PA)
Sessions (R-AL)
Shelby (R-AL)
Smith (R-NH)
Smith (R-OR)
Snowe (R-ME)
Specter (R-PA)
Stevens (R-AK)
Thomas (R-WY)
Thompson (R-TN)
Thurmond (R-SC)
Voinovich (R-OH)
Warner (R-VA)

 

NAYs —44

Akaka (D-HI)
Baucus (D-MT)
Bayh (D-IN)
Biden (D-DE)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Boxer (D-CA)
Breaux (D-LA)
Bryan (D-NV)
Byrd (D-WV)
Cleland (D-GA)
Conrad (D-ND)
Daschle (D-SD)
Dodd (D-CT)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Durbin (D-IL)
Edwards (D-NC)
Feingold (D-WI)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Graham (D-FL)
Harkin (D-IA)
Inouye (D-HI)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kennedy (D-MA)
Kerrey (D-NE)
Kerry (D-MA)
Kohl (D-WI)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
Lieberman (D-CT)
Lincoln (D-AR)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Moynihan (D-NY)
Murray (D-WA)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV)
Robb (D-VA)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Sarbanes (D-MD)
Schumer (D-NY)
Torricelli (D-NJ)
Wellstone (D-MN)
Wyden (D-OR)

 

Present – 1

Fitzgerald (R-IL)    

 

Not Voting – 1

Inhofe (R-OK)    
Posted in Congress, Economy, Writeindependent.org | Comments Off on Who Sold Out Our Future?

Launch Day

Originally posted at Writeindependent.org on November 20, 2011

It is an exciting day for us here at Writeindependent.org! We want to read what you’re thinking, and see what’s going on around the country that is NOT being reported by the media. We want to know what is happening “on the ground” and in your communities, because many bureaucrats in Washington are out of touch with their constituents. Do you feel like they don’t even care about us? Let them know by writing down your thoughts.

If you have an idea that has not been outlined in legislation before Congress, here’s your chance to offer your solution. If you know a new technology that is not being utilized to its fullest, we want to hear from you! Maybe your community has been putting systems in place that can be duplicated to great effect all over the country.

Of the many ways to get involved, consider joining your voices and signing on as an Entity User. For example, your university’s department has produced ground-breaking research from which we could all benefit. Or a fifth grade teacher with an imaginative 5th grade class gives her students a project to come up with the best way to solve the immigration issue! We have great, intelligent kids who can become part of the process of getting the country back on its feet, one child at a time.

This is your website, America! Use this tool to our advantage and create a better future for everyone!

Posted in Writeindependent.org | Comments Off on Launch Day