Gerrymandering

Originally posted at Writeindependent.org on April 29, 2012

I want to set the record straight once and for all: I oppose gerrymandering, but I allow for redistricting. The Pledge for Honest Candidates touches on redistricting to address the problems of gerrymandering.

Here is the best article I’ve found that explains gerrymandering:

http://www.shmoop.com/legislative-branch/house-of-representatives.html

The facts from the above article help dispel inaccuracies that were printed in a recent article about me in the Peninsula People magazine.  The article in PPM stated: “The pledge…calls for the reversal of the redistricting instituted by the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 as a means of quashing the long-accepted practice of gerrymandering.”

First, the Federal Reserve Act has nothing to do with redistricting. The author of the article received an email from me explaining that Pledge-signers would agree to “go back to the district boundaries set in 1912, before the Federal Reserve Act of 1913.” I chose that year because it was (according to the above linked article) “by 1912 [that] the House had grown to nearly seven times its original size, with 435 members representing the 48 states that existed at the time.”

If we could “go back” to 1912 district boundaries, we would have smoother lines to start with. If redistricting could start all over again with the 1912 boundaries, without gerrymandering, it would be a thing of beauty. Alas, it will never be without some kind of miracle.

That is why I re-wrote the small paragraph in the Pledge regarding redistricting to say: “That from this day forward, I will vote to give the responsibility to determine the boundaries of states’ districts in the U.S. House of Representatives to an impartial group of citizens not running for office wherever a state requires redistricting to apportion the population accordingly.”

The “impartial group of citizens” should follow the guidelines put in place by the Reapportionment Act of 1929 and congress’ own rules: that boundaries should be drawn to create districts that are geographically contiguous, compact, and roughly equal in population. Again, without going back to 1912 boundaries, it may take a hundred years to smooth out district lines and make them compact and contiguous again.

The second mistake in the above Peninsula People quote is that it assumes the practice of gerrymandering has been “long-accepted.” I doubt very much that it has been acceptable to anyone other than those it benefits, but if it were accepted, it was only because of acquiescence and a complicit allowance of the practice. People unfamiliar with the term “gerrymandering” have no idea what is going on, and most people familiar with it who don’t like it wouldn’t have the faintest idea how to combat it.

Lucky for us, a small group of concerned citizens helped write a proposal that fixes the problem of redistricting by appointing a nonpartisan committee to oversee the process, rather than the very same politicians who would benefit from mucking with the boundaries. Now, if only this same Prop 11 were passed in all the states with more than one district, we would all be much better off.

The most important thing I learned from the article I’ve referenced at the beginning of this post is that only about 100 seats in congress could go to either party. Gerrymandering has made more than 300 seats dedicated to the incumbent party. The only way things change in those 300+ districts is IF PEOPLE WOULD STOP VOTING THE FOR THE INCUMBENTS. If we keep this congress that can’t pass a budget, we have only ourselves to blame.

Stop the insanity this year, voters! Kick out your congressman and vote in a Pledge-signer. Not only would we get a budget passed, we can stop the egregious funding of campaigns.

Posted in Money In Politics, Voting, Writeindependent.org | Comments Off on Gerrymandering

Pit of Despair

Originally posted at Writeindependent.org on April 28, 2012

Avoiding the “Pit of Despair”

I just spent the last ten minutes laughing my ass off. I was watching this segment on the Colbert Report: http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/414121/may-10-2012/threatdown—interdimensional-black-people–gay-strokes—manipulative-sicko-monkeys

But that’s not why I’m writing about the pit of despair. It’s because I research topics like drug cartels, and immigration, and the more I know, the closer I get to the pit.

As I have stated before, I live in paradise. Nothing should get me down, except that I know horrible, almost unspeakable events are happening elsewhere. Almost as bad as people suffering tragedy is that folks think there is a black-or-white answer to these problems. Like immigration: just deport all illegals. Or gay rights: just tell them to turn straight! Or women’s healthcare: just tell them to abstain or get pregnant, and no fair getting sick if we don’t help you. In fact, if you have female problems, just deal with it, okay? Or drug cartels: just go in and do “target practice.”  And bigotry? It shouldn’t even exist, because at the genetic level, you can’t tell the color of a person’s skin. These are the things I’ve heard just this week.

I’m here to say, we live in grey. It’s not so simple, but yet simpletons don’t mind putting out their simple thoughts. If it were so simple, we wouldn’t have huge arguments about these things.

I don’t blame the simpletons for these black-or-white thoughts. It’s the way people handle the arbitrariness, the uncertainty of life. It gives a person the illusion of control over their life.

So back to the pit of despair issue: how does one avoid it?

Here is my best answer: find other positive people, and share your positivism. Maintain your own sense of “doing what’s right” and be an example by living that way. You can’t change other people’s actions, you can only do your own thing.

That, and: watch some comedy. Because even in the worst of times, we have to laugh!

Posted in Writeindependent.org | Comments Off on Pit of Despair

BCRA Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act

Originally posted at Writeindependent.org on April 27, 2012

BCRA Stands for the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, and it was co-sponsored by Russ Feingold (D-WI) and John McCain (R-AZ), which is why it is often referred to as “McCain-Feingold.” This legislation was the starting place for what eventually passed through the Senate and became law, called HR 2356, introduced by Chris Shays (R-CT).

Let’s make one thing perfectly clear: this legislation did little to help remove money from politics. It may have shed some light on soft money funding, as when donations flow from a special interest to a national political party. It also banned ads for specific candidates when the ad ran 30 days before a primary or 60 days before the general election and targeted a certain issue, like right to life or the environment.

Citizens United overturned the issue-ad funding part of the bill, but do these two parts of BCRA really remove the conflict of interest problems when a congressman (or woman) starts making the rounds in Washington? I think not! In fact, many bills that pass in congress dance around the issues and are not written with efficiency in mind because that would be too easy. Instead, bills are corrupted so that the same mechanisms stay in place that favor the monied interests, time and again. It doesn’t matter what bill is on the floor; they are all reviewed and rewritten to favor the companies who have the most money.

It will be interesting to see if the No Budget/No Pay act, pushed by No Labels (a nonpartisan, non profit seeking to make congress work across party lines) will ever pass. If it does, it will be an anomaly:  an act that clearly does not benefit the people serving in congress but may actually help the people.

Posted in Voting, Writeindependent.org | Comments Off on BCRA Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act

The Power of Voting

Originally posted at Writeindependent.org on April 26, 2012

“The bottom line for me is clear: citizens must read and think, or perish from the earth as slaves to those who control money. There is only one thing that matters more than money in this world, and that is the vote. In a representative democracy, the vote can be bought with ease *until* the moment comes when citizens realize that they can combine the use of public sources to reach conclusions (open source intelligence) with self-organization via the Internet, with civil action (cyber-advocacy, street-advocacy, communication and voting) to *take back the power.* It is not terrorism that scares the corporate carpetbaggers, it is something much more powerful: thinking citizens willing to spend the time keeping their corporate servants in line.”

Robert Steele, in a review of Norm Chomsky’s book, Profit Over People

Posted in Writeindependent.org | Comments Off on The Power of Voting

Foregiveness

Originally posted at Writeindependent.org on April 25, 2012

“It hath been said that the continuation of the species is due to man’s being forgiving. Forgiveness is holiness; by forgiveness the universe is held together. Forgiveness is the might of the mighty; forgiveness is sacrifice; forgiveness is quiet of mind. Forgiveness and gentleness are the qualities of the Self-possessed. They represent eternal virtue.”
–Mahabharata

Source: http://www.yogananda-srf.org/HowtoLive/Forgiveness.aspx#.Ukz17HCE4_Y

Did you know that Steve Jobs read this book every year of his adult life:

http://www.amazon.com/Autobiography-Reprint-Philosophical-library-Edition/dp/1565892127/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1380775982&sr=8-1&keywords=paramahansa+yogananda

 

Posted in Writeindependent.org | Comments Off on Foregiveness

New Methods for Storing Hydrogen

Originally posted at Writeindependent.org on April 25, 2012

New methods for storing hydrogen

http://www.utdallas.edu/news/2011/10/27-13641_Breakthrough-Holds-Promise-for-Hydrogens-Use-as-Fu_article-wide.html

http://peswiki.com/index.php/Video:Water_as_Fuel_%28via_ZPE%29

Xogen

http://www.xogen.ca/contact.php

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=187846

Vehicle conversion:

http://www.etecevs.com/pdf/h2_ice.pdf

http://www.switch2hydrogen.com/

http://www.appropedia.org/ICE_fuel_conversion

Posted in Energy, Writeindependent.org | Comments Off on New Methods for Storing Hydrogen

Romney Fires People

Originally posted at Writeindependent.org on April 24, 2012

If people haven’t figured out that lack of regulation of the financial industry and disparity in income are the two biggest reasons for our financial woes; and that Romney’s platform for the economy is less regulation for the financial industry and a greater disparity in income, then the fact that Romney profited by converting employee pension plans to “profits” and finding ways to dissemble companies or finding people hard up enough to work harder for less money won’t mean much to them.

–Steve of Florida found at this site: http://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2012/01/10/will-mitt-romneys-record-at-bain-capital-be-his-downfall

http://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolitics/2012/01/10/144938684/rivals-attack-romney-s-record-at-bain-capital

 

Posted in Economy, Writeindependent.org | Comments Off on Romney Fires People

How to Save the Economy

Originally posted at Writeindependent.org on April 23, 2012

306 billion pounds more debt than all the money in circulation

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jx9w2beoGcw

“If you have a situation where you have a lot of unused resources and there’s just not enough money flowing in the economy, then if you put some new money into the economy, then that can stimulate, well, economic activity.”

http://www.positivemoney.org.uk/our-proposals/

Posted in Economy, Writeindependent.org | Comments Off on How to Save the Economy

Party Loyalty: The Reason Nothing Changes

Originally posted at Writeindependent.org on April 22, 2012

People expected “change” from Obama, and no doubt they will expect “change” from Romney, but one thing is certain: there will be no profound and lasting change if people continue to vote their party line. Why? Because the parties are part of the problem.

Parties “own” people. They dictate how you think, how you vote, how you behave because they know that you are afraid of “the other party.” They prey on that fear and use it as a campaign strategy to scare you into voting the party line.

I can’t tell you how many times I’ve heard “I have to vote for ____ because if the other guy wins, we’re in for big trouble.” They are right, but not for the reason they think. It’s not because the other guy is that much worse; it’s because they are BOTH bad.

And I mean bad like: they are ruining our country. Both of them. Here’s why:

Obama caves in to the bankers, the military industrial complex, and the oil industry. All you have to do is look at his record and you can see that he hasn’t been able to increase taxes on the wealthy (though the Republicans weren’t helpful to balance the budget) or stop the madness with offshore tax havens or special tax loopholes for hedge fund managers. But most of all, he didn’t even TRY to fix the balloon that the derivatives market has become. It’s the elephant in the room that neither Republicans nor Democrats want to address. Until credit default swaps and the derivatives market is reined in, we do not have a “reality based economy.” So if you think Obama’s done a great job holding off a recession or a depression, think again. He’s just put off the inevitable.

When Obama refused to reinstate the Kyoto Protocol, and instead crafted the Copenhagen Accord which is non-binding, he basically thumbed his nose at global warming. When he signed the NDAA (National Defense Appropriations Act) he proved that the military industrial complex was in his back pocket. War is big business, and it will be business as usual. Don’t expect your soldiers to come home any time soon with Obama at the helm, parents. Regarding the healthcare bill, Democrats know that he caved in to the insurance industry and the pharmaceutical industry to come up with a very lukewarm, very compromised program that doesn’t have a public option.

Republicans: since when should the clergy dictate women’s “healthcare”?

Why is there is no limit to campaign spending, even at a time when half of America is struggling to keep a roof over its head and food in the cupboard. They are the other half of the reason that the rich can easily get richer while the poor can’t seem to get a break. If “trickle down” economics really worked, would we have the unemployment we’re seeing now? If tax breaks for the rich really created jobs, where are those jobs (since they have their tax breaks, don’t they?)

And if Romney becomes president, well, let’s just say I hope to God he doesn’t do to America what he did to the companies he was supposed to “save” at Bain. I will do a thorough investigation of his record at Bain and let you know how many companies he pulled through versus how many went bankrupt, while he made away with all his bonuses and high salary and everyone that got laid off, fired, or had to close up shop got nothing. If he privatizes Medicare and Social Security the way the banking industry handled our housing industry, well, I shudder to think of the consequences.

I know a highly educated, supreme court fellowship-winning beltway insider Democrat who won’t look at any other options than Obama and the status quo. I must say, I was a bit disappointed. When party loyalty gets really bad, the loyalists lose their ability to think rationally. Many people claim they don’t have enough time to research their political options, but when someone works closely with the federal government, I should think they have an obligation to be part of the solution when their government is going awry, as ours has. Unless of course, they are part of the problem itself.

Yes, we all have to put bread on the table. But one of the reasons things are getting bad lately is that the system is broken. If we take steps to fix it now, we may work ourselves out of this situation and lead the rest of the world from a “just getting by” survivalist attitude to one of strength, creativity and determination with a positive outlook about the abundance this world offers.

Before we can realize abundance again, we have to realize health: of ourselves, our food, and our planet. Nothing is going to improve until we clean up our act and take on our responsibilities. Parties be damned; function from a position of “what needs to be done?” and let’s do it.

I think the only reason a guy runs for president is his big fat ego. Neither of these men really care about you or me, or the country for that matter. They want to look like they did something great, being president. When actually, they’re just helping the fat cats maintain their fat or get fatter. They aren’t problem solvers, they don’t know how to create or inspire, or teach. All they do is yak yak yak, and I for one am sick of it.

Put me on record as saying: Obama doesn’t own his balls. He has sold his soul so many times, he can’t even keep track. And Romney is a disingenuous, fake, selfish egotist who doesn’t have a soul to begin with. He’s hollow. There’s nobody home.

We need a vision for this country. That’s what is lacking from these two horrible men. Obama seems to say all the correct things, but he has no spine for follow-through. It all sounds like rhetoric now. I can see right through it. And Michele, she’s on this kick with the military, trying to show how sorry she feels that they aren’t being assimilated or honored by our civilians. I don’t believe that she or her husband really want to end the wars. They haven’t done anything to stop it. They perpetuate the same game. It’s a game, run by a few dictators and power-mongers who throw their weight around the chessboard, while we aren’t enjoying the show.

 

Posted in Congress, Economy, Money In Politics, Voting, Writeindependent.org | Comments Off on Party Loyalty: The Reason Nothing Changes

The Economic Bill of Rights

Originally posted at Writeindependent.org on April 21, 2012

Let’s take a page out of the history books because we are coming out of a time very similar to the Great Depression. Let’s look at the inspirational Economic Bill of Rights that Franklin D. Roosevelt planted in the minds of Americans in a State of the Union address in 1944. If ever we needed these rights repeated, it is now.

It is our duty now to begin to lay the plans and determine the strategy for the winning of a lasting peace and the establishment of an American standard of living higher than ever before known. We cannot be content, no matter how high that general standard of living may be, if some fraction of our people—whether it be one-third or one-fifth or one-tenth—is ill-fed, ill-clothed, ill-housed, and insecure.

This Republic had its beginning, and grew to its present strength, under the protection of certain inalienable political rights—among them the right of free speech, free press, free worship, trial by jury, freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures. They were our rights to life and liberty.

As our nation has grown in size and stature, however—as our industrial economy expanded—these political rights proved inadequate to assure us equality in the pursuit of happiness.

We have come to a clear realization of the fact that true individual freedom cannot exist without economic security and independence. “Necessitous men are not free men.” People who are hungry and out of a job are the stuff of which dictatorships are made.

In our day these economic truths have become accepted as self-evident. We have accepted, so to speak, a second Bill of Rights under which a new basis of security and prosperity can be established for all—regardless of station, race, or creed.

Among these are:

The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the nation;

The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation;

The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return which will give him and his family a decent living;

The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad;

The right of every family to a decent home;

The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health;

The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment;

The right to a good education.

All of these rights spell security. And after this war is won we must be prepared to move forward, in the implementation of these rights, to new goals of human happiness and well-being.

America’s own rightful place in the world depends in large part upon how fully these and similar rights have been carried into practice for all our citizens.

For unless there is security here at home there cannot be lasting peace in the world.

I want to bring you back to these words: We have come to a clear realization of the fact that true individual freedom cannot exist without economic security and independence. “Necessitous men are not free men.” People who are hungry and out of a job are the stuff of which dictatorships are made.

This truly scares me: that we are at a time in history when we can actually see the possibility of a dictator coming into power: one that promises a bowl of rice for each person, the way communism was sold to the Chinese. If you don’t know the history behind how communism took hold in China, you really should learn. What we are seeing today is the robber baron class making it appealing for the poor to think of a bowl of rice as a good enough reason to accept socialism.

If you want to keep your democracy, you have to exercise it! Go out and vote this November, and kick out the plutocrats that are keeping the robber baron class running the show!

Posted in Economy, Writeindependent.org | Comments Off on The Economic Bill of Rights